A collaboration starts with a useful reason for two audiences to read each other’s work. Share a relevant topic and placement idea, then work with Partner Support to review the proposal.
Start with reader relevance
Explain the connection between the proposed page and its audience. A contextual reference should help readers. Avoid irrelevant links, fabricated endorsements, bulk outreach, and placements created only for rankings.
Prepare a reviewable proposal
- The public site or page and the responsible contact.
- Topic, audience, and proposed article or update.
- Exact destination, proposed anchor, and surrounding paragraph.
- Commercial consideration, affiliate disclosure, and rights requiring review.
- Why the reference is useful and who reviews it.
A practical workflow
- Prepare the inquiry.
- Review the email draft and send it yourself to Partner Support.
- Wait for an actual response before treating anything as agreed.
- Use the brief to document the proposed copy or a live placement.
Quality review
| Area | Question |
|---|---|
| Relevance | Does the paragraph help the actual reader? |
| Accuracy | Does it avoid unsupported product claims? |
| Rights | Can both parties use the proposed material? |
| Disclosure | Is the commercial relationship clear? |
| Maintenance | Who checks the destination and context over time? |
Accurate expectations
Agree on the scope, editorial fit, responsibilities, and schedule before either party publishes. Do not offer favorable review positions in return for a reward. A proposal remains a proposal until the parties agree.